Jessie Popes Attitude toward War in the Poem Whos For...

Jessie Pope was a journalist who wrote recruitment poems for the Daily Mail during the First World War. The poems she did write were positive propaganda poems for the war; her objective was to stimulate patriotism in the readers so that the men would join the forces. Pope wrote a persuasive poem where she compared war to a game. This is illustrated in the title Whos for the game? It shows that her attitude toward war was that it was a great big event that everyone should take part in one way or another. The title is a short and punchy question inviting anyone to answer. This gives the wrong impression of the war, it is misleading. Pope was ridiculed for doing this, but if she did write the†¦show more content†¦This is compared to a game like rugby, which was a popular sport amongst men at this time, whilst meaning who will rise to this duty with no fear, again appealing to masculine instinct and encouraging men to recruit. The final line: And who thinks hed rather sit tight? In other words she is asking who would rather be a coward and not do anything - the purpose of this line is to evoke quilt within the men so when it comes to making the decision the questions will linger in their minds. The quilt trip was not uncommon at this time and was a useful strategy of putting them in awkward positions felling embarrassed if they do choose not to fight but stay at home taking the easy route. This corresponds with poetry such as For the Fallen by Laurence Binyon. The second verse talks of patriotism, wholl give his country a hand in fighting against the enemy. This was known as xenophobic or jingoistic poetry - a very popular form of poetry at the time as posters such as the Kitchener appeal and other poets were alongside this. This is again is in reference to the cowardice of those who do not join in comparison with those willing to give their lives to their country. The cowards are the man with a seat in the stand that are compared with the men who want a turn to himself in the show. The reference to warShow MoreRelatedEssay Comparison of Three First World War Poems1162 Words   |  5 PagesFirst World War Poems The three poems that I will be studying in this essay are â€Å"Dulce Et Decorum Est† by Wilfred Owen, â€Å"Comrades: An Episode† by Robert Nichols and â€Å"Who’s For The Game?† by Jessie Pope. These poems are about the First World War and two of them seem to have a negative attitude criticising and downgrading the so-called spectacular experience of the First World War. In â€Å"Dulce Et Decorum Est† Wilfred Owen seems to mention good aspects of the War but comparesRead MoreComparing Jessie Owenss Whos for the Game and Wilfred Owens Dulce Est Decorum Est506 Words   |  3 PagesComparing Jessie Owenss Whos for the Game and Wilfred Owens Dulce Est Decorum Est In Jessie Popes Whos for the Game? the presentation of war is quite different to what you might expect. This poem is a recruiting poem with the aim of encouraging men to volunteer to join the forces. It was written at the beginning of the First World War and therefore the true disastrous effects of the war had not been experienced. Those left behind, women, children and exempt men, wereRead MoreThe Tradition Of War Poetry Essay2221 Words   |  9 Pages The Tradition Of War Poetry By comparing and contrasting a selection of war poems consider the ways in which attitudes to war have been explored and expressed. When considering poetry written post 1900 concentrate on a selection of poems written by Wilfred Owen. Humans have turned to poetry in many different instances as a way of expressing them selves, using the best combination of words, in the best order to express exactly how they are feeling at that moment. Read MoreA Comparison Of Differing Views/Attitudes To War With Reference To Regeneration, Strange Meeting, Selected Poetry and A Journeys End2323 Words   |  10 PagesDiffering Views/Attitudes To War With Reference To Regeneration, Strange Meeting, Selected Poetry and A Journeys End David Lloyd George once commented, in a highly patriotic sense upon ‘the making of a new Europe-a new world’, to what degree was this true is debatable to a great extent, after all the armistice signed on November 11th 1918, didn’t confirm victory but only to learn a horrific number of 9,000,000 million fatalities were caused due to world war 1. Surely enough